Comments on: Jane Harman (D-CA): Bush Co-Conspirator

By: The Reverend

The Reverend — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:09:27 +0000

Feinstein is another one, King. No time left for her, no time….The Guess Who.
There's word she may run for governor. Good riddance.

It's the transparency. That's the problem. But Obama is changing that. And while I, in know way, am arguing for bloated government, the world's only superpower and largest economic engine in world history, it would seem, just might require a large federal government.

The answer to all this stuff is campaign finance reform. It is. All congressional and executive branch candidates must campaign on a set amount of public funds. It's the only way.

Like drugs…..the profit has to be taken out of it to get it under control.

Having said what I think is painfully clear, I'm not optimistic about public campaign financing ever becoming reality.

By: Dave

Dave — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:29:04 +0000

A perfect example of why more power should be given to states, and less power to the Federal Gov't. The states may get corrupt too, but at least they are close to home an you have to deal less with California dictating where Ohio money is spent.

By: Da King

Da King — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:34:12 +0000

For more corruption, read about how Sen. Diane Feinstein intervened to allow her husband to cash in on the foreclosure crisis.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/21/sen-feinsteins-husband-cashes-crisis/

By: Da King

Da King — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:28:05 +0000

Can't really go along with the telco stuff being terroristic when the purpose of the telcos cooperation was to combat terrorism, but….

Harman and Gonzales both have some 'splaining to do, that's for sure.

This is, just as you said, a look at how corrupt Washington D.C. is on the inside.

Which is why turning more and more power over to the federal government, as the Obamans want, is a VERY BAD IDEA. You know what they say about absolute power, it corrupts absolutely. Truer words were never spoken.