Good one Rev, Thanks for giving us the whole story and the whole quote. Even most libs would agree with what he said. Typical lib reporting and twists and distortions of the truth.

There were quite a few people at the tax rally today. No signs that said hang Obama or Obama is a criminal. Not as many showed as would a war protest or a million man march or PETA rally. I wish more could have shown up but alas most conservatives have real jobs and don't work for groups like ACORN to fight for the leaches.

Good speakers, no urine or feces throwing like the libs. No burning or turning over cars, just a good old fashioned protest to get out the word. Also none of the speakers that I heard said anything disrespectful of pres Obama but spoke of our whole govt. I'm sure the libs will find a way to twist it up more than they have already.

"he admitted to an uneasy relationship with the whole idea of rights."

Why in the hell would a Supreme Court Justice be "uneasy" with the "Whole idea of rights?"

He's simply a bitter man addicted to porn. Now, the porn I don't care about, but his bitterness bleeds through his every page on the Court. He feels guilty about himself, having been selected, in his mind, to the Court because he's an affirmative-action black man. Now, he spreads that bitter guilt throughout any Court case that even smells like some small person is getting something out of it.

The reason I even mentioned Thomas is because he just spoke out in an address to a college. And he answered a question about the Bill of Rights.

Thomas and Scalia have problems with a right to privacy. Scalia says outright that Americans are not guaranteed that right.

Thomas's comment about entitlement mentality is just more of his bitterness towards those less fortunate or vulnerable. He's black, blacks are the people of welfare and affirmative action entitlements, he's a living example…..and that's why he hates welfare and entitlements. You figure it out. He's a messed up guy.

His argument that Americans think they're entitled to prosperity is just pure bunk.

And Roy….the spelling stuff happens, no matter how careful a person tries to be. No worries.

Why didn't you include the rest of the quote from Justice Thomas?
“It seems that many have come to think that each of us is owed prosperity and a certain standard of living. They’re owed air-conditioning, cars, telephones, televisions."

Because then it wouldn't fit your fake storyline. He says nothing about getting rid of rights. He is not comparing them to nuclear proliferation. He is talking about people having obligations to the country.

You are correct that this is not something Omaba would have ever said. Its more like President Kennedy when he said, "Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country."

You are lying about him wanting to get rid of the bill of rights. But when have you let the facts get the way of one of your lies.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/14/us/14bar.html?ref=global-home

Arch-conservative and severely-bitter Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas recently stated that he wasn't really, you know, down…on all those rights, saying….

'Today there is much focus on our rights,' Justice Thomas said. 'Indeed, I think there is a proliferation of rights. I am often surprised by the virtual nobility that seems to be accorded those with grievances,' he said. 'Shouldn't there at least be equal time for our Bill of Obligations and our Bill of Responsibilities?'

Thomas, unlike anything that Obama has said, mocks our Bill of Rights and any emphasis placed on preserving those rights by using phrases like, "proliferation of rights". You know, rights are like nuclear weapons. Gotta' watch out if those rights are being "proliferated".

So, yeah…..it's Obama and his Bill of Rights challenging minions who want to eliminate the Bill of Rights.

The irony is thick enough to cut with an electric knife.