Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Blog of Mass Destruction -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

The Boss

by The Reverend on March 25, 2009

in Barack Obama,economy,media

Ya' know how employees will chatter away about the boss when the boss isn't around? Those chattering employees are oh-so-sure that they know more than the boss and are happy to explain to fellow workers, whenever the boss is out of earshot, how they would do things differently and how the boss is clueless and so forth. A common dynamic.

Last night's hour long Obama press conference was like a situation where behind-the-boss's-back chatter was captured and presented in question form in front of the boss. "Reporters", like the AP's Jennifer Loven, NBC's Chuck Todd and Chip Reid, ABC's Jake Tapper, Fox's Major Garrett and CNN's cocky ass, Ed Henry……all critics of Obama's administration….found out last night that the boss is the boss for a reason.

Jennifer Loven's probing question, "why do you think the public should sign on for another new, sweeping authority for the government to take over companies, essentially?"

Obama…."keep in mind that it is precisely because of the lack of this authority that the AIG situation has gotten worse."

Loven wasn't satisfied…."But why should the public trust the government to handle that authority well?"

The Boss…."as I said before, if you look at how the FDIC has handled a situation like IndyBank, for example, it actually does these kinds of resolutions effectively when it's got the tools to do it."

Loven's assumption in her question is an old-failed-policy conservative assumption. She assumes, because Republicans and conservatives assume it, that government, as Father Ronnie used to say, "is the problem." A knowledgable "reporter" would know that the FDIC, for example, has used it's authority recently to calmly takeover 2 failed banks per week on average…all without major incident.

Boss Obama, without malice, calmly corrected the chattering "employee", Jennifer Loven, who should have known better, but sadly….didn't.

Next up, NBC's Chuck Todd. Todd, for a few days previous, was taking online questions for Obama from his readers….so he would, you know, be prepared with the most galactically profound question of the night.

Todd…."Why, given this new era of responsibility that you're asking for, why haven't you asked for something specific that the public should be sacrificing to participate in this economic recovery?"

Obama…."First of all, it's not true that we have not asked sacrifice from people who are getting taxpayer money. We have imposed some very stiff conditions. The only problem that we've had so far are contracts that were put in place before we took over."

Todd follow-up…."But you don't think there should be a specific call to action that you want the American — I mean, this is — you've described this as an economic crisis like nothing we have seen since the Great Depression."

Obama…."the American people are making a host of sacrifices in their individual lives."

Todd's question was not some deeply thought out question with profound insight….it was the typical Villager 'I'm smarter than the boss' question, and in this case, it was entirely out of place. Todd was challenging the Boss with Village wisdom. If the Boss claimed that things were really bad, and didn't ask all Americans to sacrifice, then, maybe it wasn't really so bad after all. Todd's cluelessness concerning already-suffering and sacrificing Americans losing jobs, homes, health care, etc. was more than obvious in his question.

Jake Tapper and Chip Reid both posed gotcha style questions trying to make Obama look like he was trashing his own campaign plans and promises. Read those and the Boss's answers in the full transcript.

But the winner of the night's "employee chatter" award was Mr. Ed Henry of CNN.

Henry….."So on AIG, why did you wait — why did you wait days to come out and express that outrage? It seems like the action is coming out of New York in the attorney general’s office. It took you days to come public with Secretary Geithner and say, look, we’re outraged. Why did it take so long?"

Obama…."Well, it took us a couple of days because I like to know what I’m talking about before I speak. (Laughter.) All right?"

Ed Henry's stupid question encapsulated the nutty Villager focus over the last week or so. Padders, like Henry, have been trying to create some Obama administration 'scandal' over AIG employee bonuses….how outraged everyone should be over them….and how Obama, somehow, didn't act quickly enough, or wasn't sufficiently outraged.

Boss Obama demonstrated why folks like Ed Henry aren't the boss. Obama dismissed Henry's silly Villager question by answering in common-sense, non-Village, words. "I like to know what I'm talking about before I speak."

You know, unlike you Village Knee Padders….Ed.

Or, as Molly Ivors over on Eschatonblog.com put it this morning….

"In honor of Ed Henry, who now carries his ass in a brown paper bag."

  • Da King

    Most of the questions the reporters asked yesterday were good ones. Todd's was dumb, but what do you expect from NBC ? The question about race was also dumb.

    On AIG – Obama was outraged over the AIG bonuses that Obama's own Treasury department authorized, that was in Obama's own stimulus bill that nobody, apparently including Obama, had time to read. Obama should have been outraged at his own incompetence over AIG, and THAT was how the reporter should have framed the question.

    All Obama's answers to the fiscal questions posed last night were dishonest.

  • The Reverend

    Saying that the White House projections of growth….2.6%….differed from the CBO's 2.2%……is "dishonest."

    Out of touch, D.C reporters want headline material……so they want obvious signs of outrage from Obama…for themselves. How childish and self-serving.

    What possible good could it do to yell or stamp his feet and openly warn and threaten Wall Street bonus babies? That's right…none.

    AIG happened during the last administration and the response to it's collapse, came from the last administration…..who alllowed for the bonuses.

    Non-story…..but not for out-of-touch headline seekers.

  • larry d.

    Todds question was dumb and so was the answer. The obvious answer is Americans are already sacrificing plenty, to the tune of a couple trillion dollars so far!

  • The Reverend

    The answer…."Americans are already sacificing by losing jobs, homes, health care.."……is "dumb?"

    Pardon me, what?

  • larry d.

    "Dumb" was the wrong word, but why not mention the trillions we're paying out, Reverend? It never occurred to either one of those clowns. It's the same mindset that conflates 'tax cuts' and 'spending.'

  • Da King

    With either the CBO's or Obama's growth projections, Obama is adding more deficits and debt than any president in American history. Then Obama acts like it's all the GOP's fault, and that Obama is the fiscally responsible one. That is dishonest to the nth degree. Obama didn't "inherit" $7-10 trillion in deficits and a doubling or tripling of the national debt, he is CREATING that scenario himself.

  • The Reverend

    You're missing some stuff. Bush's deficits would have been astronomical if he hadn't supplementaled the wars.

    Secondly, our economy will experience growth spurts, some probably significant in the near to medium term. Revenues will increase. Tax increases on the upper crust will help revenues as well.

    Now consider this. Bush doubled the national debt in 8 years…..and yet, despite even a very severe decline caused by the moneychangers….we're doing okay. The Chinese know who they're dealing with. They'll buy the debt because we buy their products.

    On top of all that, Obama has promised to cut spending as he goes along. You don't believe him….but that doesn't mean he won't follow through.

  • Da King

    Rev, economic growth is ALREADY INCLUDED in both Obama and the CBO's deficit projections, as are Obama's revocation of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthier citizens. Your point is nullified.

    Obama has promised to cut spending, and you're right. I don't believe him. He has done nothing but increase spending beyond all historical levels. The only area in which I expect Obama will decrease spending is in the area of defense. He will increase everything else drastically. It doesn't take a crystal ball to figure that out. He's already doing it.

    The Bush deficits declined for four straight years even though we were fighting two wars, had the dot-com/9/11 recession, and Hurricane Katrina. Without the wars, we would have had a budget surplus in 2007. It's a moot point, but it's true. Since the Dems took over Congress, we have had the two biggest deficit years in history, and Obama is skyrocketing it far beyond anything in the past, and he's doing it at a time when we are already up to our necks in debt to begin with. Then Obama says building solar panels and windmills will pay for it all. It's utterly insane.

    If you support what Obama has done so far in doubling down on Bush's deficit spending, you have no further credibility in complaining about Bush's deficits. You might as well start congratulating Bush for running up the debt. You might as well start saying Bush just didn't run it up far enough. That would be the more consistent position for you.

  • The Reverend

    Your thinking here is similar to this…

    An arsonist sets a house on fire, it burns to the ground…..and then the blame for the fire is placed on the shoulders of the reclamation workers.

    Bush deficits never included the cost of his wars of choice. David Copperfield type accounting may have made it appear as though his deficits were declining…..but as we now know….they never were.

    Additionally, Bush was president during the years 2007-2008. You mention the Democrat's "control" of Congress during that time without mentioning that Bush had total control of all legislation with his veto pen.

    Obama is not, as you say, 'doubling down', on deficit spending. He's attempting to save the nation from economic despair. Despair is all that the "spending freeze" GOP'ers would leave us with, if they had their way.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).