Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Blog of Mass Destruction -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

"Ideological Blockage"

by The Reverend on February 10, 2009

in Barack Obama,economy,GOP,media

Ideological blockage

Miss President Obama's press conference last night? Go here.

Last night, America witnessed something they have not seen in over 8 years…..an extremely intelligent and engaged President of the U.S.
A true American leader.

The Rumpelstiltskin press, awakened on Nov. 5, 2008 from their 8 year slumber and now fully rested and prepared to rip up another Democratic president…..got taken to school last night by the most intelligent and articulate American leader in my lifetime.

This is the same press whose bias recently has been seen in their amplification of Republican and conservative objections to Obama's stimulus/recovery plan……a press obsessed with some fictitious notion of bipartisanship…..a press basically silenced last night by President Obama's mastery of the issues and unvarnished descriptions of Republican obstructionism.

An example: Mara Liasson of NPR, also seen on Fox Freaks and Friends, opened her question to Obama last night with a lie, and had that lie launched right back at her by a much more intelligent and quicker debater, Obama. Liasson, wringing her hands with pseudo-concern over the failure of Republicans to vote for Obama's stimulus bill, asked…."are you going to need a new legislative model bringing in Republicans from the very beginning?"

"Old habits are hard to break," Obama responded. "Now, just in terms of the historic record here, the Republicans WERE brought in early, and were consulted. And you'll remember that when we initially introduced our framework, they were pleasantly surprised and complimentary about tax cuts that were presented in that framework. Those tax cuts are still in there……but there was consultation, there will continue to be consultation."

But Obama didn't settle for just one bitchslap to Mara Liasson's obviously phony question….he took it one step further….

"People have to break out of their ideological rigidity….a prime example….when it comes to how we approach the issue of fiscal responsibility. Again, it's a little hard for me to take criticism from folks about this recovery package after they presided over a doubling of the national debt. I'm not sure they have a lot of credibility when it comes to fiscal responsibility."

See how simple it is? Obama not only slapped Liasson down for repeating a totally fictitious Republican talking point about how poor GOP'ers weren't consulted on the stimulus…… he also went on to review recent history for those in the room stricken by some weird amnesia. Republicans, contrary to Mara Liasson's frame, have lost credibility in the fiscal conservancy arena because of their "presiding over a doubling of the national debt."

As Obama closed his press conference last night, he said this, "Although there are some politicians arguing we should do nothing, there are very few economists who are making that argument. You've got economists who advised John McCain, economists who were advisers to George Bush 1 and 2, all suggesting that we actually needed a serious recovery package. And so when I hear people saying aww…we don't need to do anything…this is a spending bill not a stimulus bill…without acknowledging that, by definition, part of any stimulus bill would include spending. That's the point. Then what I get a sense of is that there's some ideological blockage there that needs to be cleared out."

Now, The Reverend has dealt with arterial blockage, requiring major surgery, and, like most everyone else, household drain blockage which required Drano or a roto-rooter. I'm thinking that the ideological blockage currently diseasing the Republican Party will require even more extensive electoral surgery, say, in 2010. After which, Republicans can rest comfortably and recuperate from their quiet spots on the sidelines.

Just what I'm thinking.

  • larry d.

    "You did it first" isn't all that impressive a debate point, Reverend. In fact it comes off as a little pissy, again. So does the recent harping on 'ideological' arguments. Of course it's all ideological or we wouldn't have parties, leftist blogs or any direction at all.

    The thing that struck me most was the staged quality. Why do the fake 'press conference' format at all?

    It would also be nice if the president knew what his whacky v.p. selection is talking about when he makes his crazyass pronouncements.

  • The Reverend

    Talk about pissy.

    Ideology is about…..ideas.

    Republican economic ideas have failed.

    Therefore, the only conclusion a sound-minded leader can come to, is to not go back to those failed ideas.

    What believers in failed ideas want…..is ongoing respect for those ideas.

    And it's not a staged press conference when several conservative/wingnut questioners are given opportunity to participate…..and when Obama exhaustively answers those questioners.

    Failed-policy believers simply didn't like the answers. That's tough.

  • mary

    Republicans are not trying to debate the stimulus or the economy or health care or anything so much as they are try to push philosophical word play about the role of government and what it should and should not do. As they push that useless debate, the American people will not benefit. Times have changed and the Republicans keep trying to push a set of beliefs that they believe were responsible for period of stability in the past. They are stuck looking backward trying to reclaim that past. America needs to turn around and face the future and we need to do it now.

  • mary

    From James Moore at Huffington Post

    "……….Too much of our population has now grown cynical from the lies and cheating and stealing that they do not expect any change. We no longer anticipate much from congress and the senate and our media beyond entertainment, and they don't even do that well. Watching Republicans wail about the stimulus plan is laughable after their silent acquiescence over the Wall Street bailout of hundreds of billions. The markets must be saved even though the homeowners and workers can be sacrificed. Things couldn't have been too bad, actually, if some of those firms receiving bailout money decided to pay it back right away when they learned that salaries were to be capped by congress at $500,000. The Democrats, for their part, seem almost as if they can't think of anything to do but print more money and give it away to different interests, along with more bankers.

    Oh sure, none of this is our fault. America is not to blame. There are just some bad actors in high profile positions. Really? Our sports heroes are gone, exposed as liars and cheaters. The people we trust with our money turn out to be thieves of a magnitude not known to history. Our president lies us into war, ruins damned near every institution of our government with political folly, and then retires safe from the law in the western sun. You can't even ask the question "What the hell's wrong with us?" because the answer requires decades of explanation. An increasing number of Americans wonder if our country will even survive and a scary proportion of those have asked the troubling follow up question as to whether we deserve to survive and have entered our final decline.

    I don't know anything except for the fact that I hate the Yankees. "

  • The Reverend

    While I share some of the writer's pessimism, it is also true that in 3 short weeks, Obama has changed things. Gitmo closing, torture banned, Lilly Ledbetter, S-CHIP, and now the stimulus and banking plans.

    It's taken us 30 years to get into the situation we're in. Reform won't come overnight.

    The writer points out Republican hypocrisy and seeks to make that equivalent to Democrat's "printing money". That's a very misguided comparison and, in reality, isn't even true.

    I feel the writer's pain….but this stuff ain't beanbag.

  • larry d.

    Many republicans were up in arms before the bank bailout. And you can't look at the future without understanding the past–throwing money at problems is the perfect example.

    Of course the whining about 'ideological' arguments about the role of government is perfect evidence that this administration and you minions hope to squelch such discussion. It clearly shows that such debate is particularly important at this time.

  • The Reverend

    We're supposed to waste time endlessly discussing obviously failed conservative economic policies?

    To what end?

  • mary

    Oh I am not that pessimistic either — I just started giggling when I read it because the author was not happy about anything.

  • Da King

    The Republican (Bush) idea that failed was – cut taxes and rapidly increase federal spending at the same time. That's how the debt doubled.

    Obama's solution ? Cut taxes and increase spending even more rapidly at the same time.

    Only the mentally challenged could think Obama was brilliant in this context.

  • Da King

    mary,
    One correction to that Huffington post article. The writer says, "watching Republicans wail about the stimulus plan is laughable after their silent acquiescence over the Wall Street bailout of hundreds of billions."

    Fact: The majority of Republicans voted AGAINST the $700 billion bailout. It was the Democrats that supported it.

    I find it more than a little ironic that Democrats are using the big spending ways of the Bush years as an excuse to spend even more during Obama's administration. The lesson learned should be precisely the opposite. The Dems are really destroying their own argument, if you think about it.

  • The Reverend

    There's a huge difference in Bush's $5 trillion dollar credit card charge and what Obama is doing with the stimulus.

    The nation only suffered additional harm when Bush spent $5 trillion more than what we could afford over 8 years. We got Medicare Plan D, which did help lower income seniors some….but other than that, all those trillions were simply wasted. Bush charged his big tax cuts for the wealthy, for crying out loud, and those big tax cuts stimulated squat.

    Obama is trying to move money, create jobs, start new-way projects….to save an economy from total collapse. Big difference….one that I'm sure you won't acknowledge….but that's how it is. Obama, and I, admit that only private enterprises can drive the economy in the long run…..but this is no ordinary time.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).