Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Blog of Mass Destruction -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

Righting The Wrongs

by The Reverend on January 23, 2009

in Barack Obama,Bush White House,executive powers,rule of law,Warrantless Wiretapping

1) President Obama had a busy day yesterday.

From Dana Priest of the Washington Post….

The military's Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, facility, where the rights of habeas corpus and due process had been denied detainees, will close, and the CIA is now prohibited from maintaining its own overseas prisons. And in a broad swipe at the Bush administration's lawyers, Obama nullified every legal order and opinion on interrogations issued by any lawyer in the executive branch after Sept. 11, 2001.

Elections have consequences. In the case of Obama's presidency following Bush's……elections have significant consequences. Obama did the right thing in closing American gulags and sh*tcanning "every legal order and opinion on interrogations issued by any lawyer in the executive branch after Sept. 11, 2001".
Every order and opinion on interrogations since 9-11. That's a big wow.

2) jimmy james mentioned recently in a comment that perennial Villager Peggy Noonan, columnist for the Washington Post, and former speechwriter for Mr. Ronald Reagan, didn't think Barack Obama's Inaugural address was overly critical toward the outgoing George W. Bush. Here's part of jimmy's tongue in cheek comment…

"Rev, you are way off base here. I just heard Peggy Noonan say on The Television Machine that Obama's speech was not a repudiation of Bush." Link

From a New York Times column by Peter Baker reprinted in today's AB Journal….first, whining from Karen Hughes, George Bush's surrogate mother….

"There were a few sharp elbows that really rankled and I felt were not as magnanimous as the occasion called for," Karen Hughes, a longtime Bush confidant, said in an interview. "He really missed an opportunity to be as big as the occasion was and, frankly, as gracious as President Bush was as he left office."

Then this….

Dan Bartlett, another top adviser, used similar language. "It was a missed opportunity to bring some of the president's loyal supporters into the fold," he said. Marc Thiessen, the chief White House speechwriter until this week, added: "It was an ungracious inaugural. It was pretty clear he was taking shots." Link

"Pretty clear he was taking shots"…….shots Peggy Noonan did not hear nor recognize. The most loyal Bushies thought Obama's address was "ungracious", "a missed opportunity", Obama guilty of "taking shots" at the former president. The closest of Bush's confidants agree that The Reverend had it right all along.

3) For years I have been blogging about the extensive crimes of the Bush-Cheney administration, but specifically their blanket violation of the 4th amendment which protects Americans from government's spying on them without judicial approval.

It isn't news to me that the Bush administration had ordered the construction of a "mirror" AT&T communications hub in San Francisco years ago through which ALL American communications were being monitored. Not just, you know, Islamofascists…..like we were told….but ALL Americans…..and ALL communications. The worst part is that it all started BEFORE 9-11. Please consider this piece from last night's Rachel Maddow show on MSNBC…..


Former NSA agent, Russell Tice, whom the Bush people have been stalking for awhile now, came out publicly Wednesday night on MSNBC's Countdown, followed by a second appearance last night. Those appearances can be seen here and here.

Tice gives firsthand information that the Bush administration, through the NSA's ongoing program of vacuuming up all American communications without judicial approval and in violation of FISA laws, specifically TARGETED U.S. news organizations and journalists.

This extensive criminal-spying behavior, when found out about in 2004 by Bush's own employees at the FBI and the Justice Department, resulted in threats of resignation by those same high level employees if the criminality wasn't stopped.

Enraged by all this, Bush went after whistleblower Thomas Tamm, the Justice Department lawyer who told the New York Times' James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, who subsequently told Americans about Bush's illegal spying program. The NY Times and the journalists in question were, undoubtedly according to Tice's new revelation, already being targeted by the very Bush program the two journalists were blowing the whistle on.

This is only the beginning of what's sure to be an avalanche of details-to-come revealing the numerous and extensive crimes of the past administration.

  • larry d.

    Reverend you should try looking at Daily Kos or the Huffington Post or something. There's a whole lefty wingnut world out there and I'm afraid your limiting yourself with Olby and Madcow.

  • The Reverend

    A little Kos from time to time. Rarely a visit to Arianna's site.

    Ever visit Counterpunch? Now there's some stuff you can really sink your teeth into….well, maybe not you…..

    Can you believe it larry, I haven't even been writing about authenthic leftist thinking, yet? You know, I'm a centrist.

    MSNBC broke news the last two nights. Major fair and balanced newscasts……crickets and yawns.

  • angry conserv

    Can somone clear up my confusion please.
    Guntanamo must be closed because
    1. it violates the basic human rights of the detainees
    2. they are being tortured
    3. they may be innocent
    BUT it is apparently OK to send misslies after people in Pakistain.
    1. What is a greater violation of ones human rights than the right to live?
    2. what torture is greater than being killed?
    3. they may be inocent, how does one know they are not?
    It is all very confusing to me.

  • larry d.

    Gitmo's not closing for a year angry c., so violating the basic human rights and torturing innocent detainees will be okay for a while, too.

    As far as Pakistan, someone said we need to be doing more over in that area of the world than dropping bombs on villages.

  • The Reverend

    Guantanomo was created as an excuse to circumvent America law. Not fully U.S. soil…..so Bush-Cheney believed U.S. law and the Constitution did not apply. That meant, to Bush-Cheney, that detainees could be tortured, held without charges and given no rights, at all.

    And that is why it needs closed. It exists to continue the lawlessness, the roguishness that Bush started.

    Bush-Cheney did not kill, capture or decapitate al-Qaeda leaders. Bin Laden and Co. are still alive and well. The resolution to use military force in Afghanistan was for the sole purpose of wiping out al-Qaeda. Mission not accomplished.

    While I don't appreciate indiscriminate bombing of civilians, like the Isrealis did in Gaza, al-Qaeda is still our enemy, guilty of the crime of 9-11….and needs to be brought to justice.

  • larry d.

    Well, it's day four and economic indicators show the Obama Economy has a lot of catching up to do to match Bush's economy, on average.

  • The Reverend

    I suppose that would be one way of looking at it….even if it is a tad, you know, twisted.

  • Da King

    A couple things, Rev.

    1) To be consistent, shouldn't you be calling Obama a "unitary executive" about now ? Or is it that you like the "unitary executive" theory now that it lines up with your political desires ?

    2) Clinton started the rendition program (holding terrorists without charge), not Bush. Btw, Bush released several hundred from Gitmo. Too many, it sound like, because some are back on the battlefield.

  • Da King

    And I guess you haven't heard – the federal court recently ruled Bush's spying program to be legal – just in time for Obama. Funny how that works.

  • larry d.

    Wow. It looks like Obama's indiscriminate bombing murdered 15 innocent Pakistanis and just 8 terrorists were killed.

    The criminal should be shackled and imprisoned.

  • The Reverend

    King is incorrect about a federal court ruling Bush's spying program legal. That is false. Totally incorrect. Not surprising, really, but totally false. A federal judge ruled that the CONGRESS had the right to re-write the FISA laws. That's what the federal judge ruled.

    The federal judge did NOT rule that Bush's spying on Americans was legal. He didn't……do the research.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).