Click to see the beacon journal online
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Blog of Mass Destruction -- Community Blog

Previous post:

Next post:

The GOP…..Now What?

by The Reverend on November 7, 2008

in Uncategorized

One common theme woven throughout right-wing blog comments about the McCain-Palin campaign was that McCain just never got tough enough with his opponent, President-elect Barack Obama. Our good friend Ben Keeler at Ohio Politics Blog commented that McCain's debate performances never focused enough on abortion, gay bashing, stem cells, and immigration. Neanderthals like Pat Buchanan and Bill Bennett often scolded McCain for not using the Rev Wright as a hammer against Obama. Conservative commenters everywhere ripped the main media for not telling American voters enough about all of Obama's alleged evil connections and associations. As openly biased for the GOP as FOX News was, even they were not enough for those in the conservative camp whose answer to all challenges is always an escalation of divisive and dirty politics.

What will the Republican Party do now? Is their future to be found in an even more virulent strain of divisiveness and intolerance….or….will the GOP reform itself, acknowledge where it failed, and seek to create a more moderate, more inclusive political party?

This from October 28th….

In skirmishes around the country in recent months, evangelicals and others who believe Republicans have been too timid in fighting abortion, gay marriage and illegal immigration have won election to the party's national committee, in preparation for a fight over the direction and leadership of the party.

One gathering, in Myrtle Beach, S.C., will be hosted by South Carolina GOP Chairman Katon Dawson. In an interview, Dawson said that "moderating our party is what caused us to lose power" in the 2006 elections. He said the party must speak more forcefully against excessive government spending and illegal immigration. Link

Steve Benen at Washington Monthly says there is a rumor that Dawson "wants the job" of Chairman of the RNC, and is "considered a leading contender".

Maybe Dawson wins control, maybe not.

Consider, however, what South Carolina's Dawson said…."moderating our party is what caused us to lose power." Dawson, somehow, believes that the last number of years of GOP control was actually a "moderating" of the Republican Party. I dare not ask what extremism would look like then.

Americans were nauseated not by moderate conservative attempts to lead the country. Quite the contrary. We were turned off, for example, by the ugly, fanatical and hateful invasion of privacy witnessed in the Terri Schiavo event. The frenzied and intentional attempt in the Schiavo intervention by Republicans, including the Republican President, to divide the nation into two camps, either for or against "life", was an unforgivable example of radical extremism "going all rogue."

Another example is the hateful, bitterness exhibited during the aftermath of Katrina towards the poor, towards blacks, towards the vulnerable….yet another example of the GOP not giving in to moderation. Boldly, folks like Rush Limbaugh and FOX pointed their fingers at the victims. A Republican administration got tough with New Orleans survivors and let them fend for themselves as the nation watched.

Bashing gays during W.'s reign was not an example of moderation. Instead, fanatically divisive conservatives in Congress sought to amend the Constitution, seeking to forever enshrine intolerance and rejection of human rights into our founding document. Conservatives were being tough, fanatically and divisively tough, not moderate.

The most egregious example of what South Carolina's Katon Dawson (what the hell kind of first name is Katon, anyway?) says was being too moderate in the GOP's approach, was the inexplicable hatred demonstrated by the extreme-right during the immigration bill discussion. "Amnesty" was screeched from the far-right's rooftops…..the "illegals" were going to take over the country, force us all to speak Spanish and turn all of our skin hues darker. How all that was too moderate by the crazy right is…umm…beyond me. What it caused was an avalanche of Latino votes for Barack Obama and the Democrats this past Tuesday. Dawson wants the GOP to take the gloves off and get even tougher.

Roy Blunt (R-MO) stepped down yesterday as the GOP's 2nd man in the House. John Boner Boehner (R-OH-Asshole), current House GOP leader, and a guy who called Barack Obama the oh-so-moderate name, "chicken sh*t", last week may join forces with men like Eric Cantor (R-VA) or Mike Pence (R-IN) to move the GOP even further into radical territory, perhaps in the belief that the GOP ass-kicking in the last two elections was because their party was simply too moderate.

To The Reverend, the landslide win by Obama Tuesday night was anti-climactic. I knew he would win and that he probably would win big. Because I believed that, my excitement level Tuesday night stayed relatively even. What will happen now, after Obama's win, is where I'm going to find continued personal satisfaction, bordering I must admit on glee. Observing the cannibalization that has already started inside the most extreme political party that I've ever seen, is the new gift that will simply keep on giving.

At The Revernd's house, Christmas has come early.

  • The Reverend's Daughter

    And the whole family has gathered 'round with bells on…

    What will the GOP say now? What will they do? I am sooo frightened for their well being as a political party. They may actually have to listen to their constituents(other than the religious zealots), OH NO! When they do, they may find out that all that hatred and bashing was for not. We are, as a country sprinting towards the ever-approaching line of tolerance and "open-mindedness".
    What ever will the GOP do with the Big Bad Wolf of Democracy knocking at their little door?

  • Bubba

    Rev, asking what type of name is Katon is no different than asking what kind of name is Barack Hussein Obama or Rahm Emmanuel. Sounds like third grade to me. Debate ideas all you want, but don't be childish.

  • Roy

    This post is just stupid on so many levels. Is this is how the new president intends to reach across the isle and call the opposition racist bigots?

    As far as gay bashers go, your party does not have a leg to stand on. Your boy Obama doesn't support gay marriage either and Clinton signed the defense of marriage act. The democrats have no use for gays other than to use them as a pawn for votes then casting aside their ideals once elected.

    I want to give Obama the benefit of the doubt this election but ignorant and inciteful people like yourself rev make that too difficult. I shall extend to our new president the same level of respect you have shown our current president. You and your brainless daughter should rethink your approach to dialogue.

  • The Reverend

    There you go Roy, trying to make it all personal and so forth.

    Calling my extremely intelligent daughter names, I suppose, is your revised method of dialogue.

    For your information, Obama, Biden and Hillary, all want to rescind or revise the Defense of Marriage Act, a hideously, hateful piece of…..legislation spawned by just the radical extremism I was referring to in my post.

    Republicans must look into the mirror. Yes, it will be painful. No one likes to admit they have effed stuff up and made serious mistakes. The first order of business should be to detach themselves from the pseudo-religious, anti-science, extremists. Tolerance is the way forward.

    Finally,….should Obama get off track, I will be right there to point it out. The still sitting president is a national and international criminal who deserves to spend a stint in federal prison. I've actually not been harsh ENOUGH on him.

  • Roy

    Rev as I have said before your insults will be met in kind. Calling a Republican a racist or a bigot because they disagree on policy issues is not conducive to reasonable dialogue. Having your daughter then parrot this myth of bashing, zealots and hatred just proves my point.

    I'm sure you miss the irony when you use tactics of George W. Bush to say that one side is good and the other is evil. The us vs them approach.

    Your reference to tolerance is dripping with irony as well. You have no tolerance for those with opposing views.

  • http://politics.ohio.com/ Ben Keeler

    I'll be waiting to see if you criticize Obama or not. I was critical of Bush many a time.

    Yes, I do think he did not comment on social issues enough during the debates. As it turned out, it wouldnt have mattered with the economy. It might be hard for you to fathom, but that is how we won in 2004. A lot of people strongly take those issues into consideration when voting.

  • The Reverend

    Holding conservative views is one thing. Attempting to build a permanent majority by dividing one segment of America from another, whether it be gays or Latinos or blacks, is quite another entirely. And it's not limited to just division, either. There is a bitterness that accompanies the division effort and that leads to mindless animosity. All in quest of political majority status.

    It's unacceptable as well as unAmerican.

    I'll be posting soon on how I think the gay/straight issue can be handled with civility. I also have some ideas for conservatives, if they want to stay relevant, on the abortion-contraception issue.

    However, two issues I simply will not bend on are anti-scientific approaches in solving national policy disputes, and government capitulating to religion rather than the will of the people.

    Roy: "this myth of bashing, zealots and hatred"

    We simply disagree over reality. I could fill hundreds of posts with examples of bashing, crazed zealotry and obvious hatred from the extremist right. Several were in my post. You just will not accept the majority's interpretation of what people do. See…with me, it's not whether these bashers believe deeply in their far-right views….I don't care how deeply they believe them…thousands of people believed deeply that they had a right to own slaves, that didn't make them right or moral.

    The so-called moral-right today holds forth over gay rights as if their deeply moral sensibilities are more worthy of consideration than the lives of millions of Americans. I don't care about the moral-right's sensibilities because this is a matter of human equality.

    I have plenty of tolerance for those with opposing views. If I didn't, I would shut off the comment sections. I love a good argument….are you kidding me?

    Problem is….far-right conservatism can't make a cogent argument anymore.

    For example, I still have never received an answer, not even a nibble, on why it is that no blacks at all, none, currently represent the Republican Party in Congress. It's a pretty big country, so you'd think there would be, at least, a couple. To me…it would seem like a self-aware political party would recognize that as a problem and seek to correct it. Just an example.

  • The Reverend

    Ben: I know that is how the GOP won in 2004. It's exactly what I'm talking about. You won then, but at what cost to the nation? You won then, by dividing Americans one against another.

    I know I will sound naive…but…it has to stop. If we want to still be the world's leading power….and we all want that…then this intolerance stuff and religion-in-government stuff must stop. Americans have a right to privacy, and running elections on demonizing those who insist on preserving that right must stop…if the Republican Party wants to still be relevant.

    Do you really believe Ben, that it's worth it to win at any costs?

  • larry d.

    The repubs lost because they spent money like drunken sailors and the economy is in shambles. I think I saw somewhere that blacks and other minorities actually voted for the anti-gay initiatives at a greater rate than us stodgy old whites, so I don't see how that can be viewed as an important dynamic in the race results.

  • The Reverend

    Perhaps you're correct.

Previous post:

Next post:

 

© The Akron Beacon Journal • 44 E. Exchange Street, Akron, Ohio 44308

Powered by WordPress
Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).