I'm used to those types of accusations from those who can't rebut what I set forward.

It's all good…because you still have a good sense of humor. During this campaign, that's important.

King: No "true Part" of the McCain story, huh? So….McCain DIDN'T write that letter to the FCC that it's Chairman said was "inapproriate"? That part wasn't true? Huh?

And when McCain DIDN'T write that letter to the FCC on behalf of Paxson Communications, he WASN'T responding to any lobbying efforts, right?

And those are NOT lobbyists running McCain's campaign, correct?

But this, King…..

"easily explainable picture of Obama in a turban"

…is a scream.

Finally….it's known as the Church of the Perpetually Immaculate Argument.

Earth to Rev. There wasn't any 'true part' to the story. It was ALL innuendo and ALL unfounded.

Notice how McCain went from squeaky clean straight talking maverick for the last 8 years to tawdry lobbyist influenced hypocrite who maybe cheated on his wife virtually overnight in the eyes of the MSM. And it all happened right after McCain was the de facto Republican nominee.

Then notice how the same MSM takes an easily explainable picture of Obama in a turban (that comes from the Clinton campaign, no less) and uses it to go 'look how nutty the wingnuts are', just as you are doing now.

Man, you are one blind Reverend. Was yours the Church Of The Perpetually Confused ?

The early local organizing account lends credibility to his message today.

The Times purposely threw a fat softball over the plate for the whackos to score on. All for the sake of rallying those whackos, reluctant as they have been, to the defense of John McCain.

The true part of the story…..the lobbyist sleaziness…..was for liberals. The Times, however, knew that the screechers would only screech on about the phony affair rumor stuff.

The Times is all things to all potential subscribers.

I just wished they would put the secret code necessary to "understand" their stories, you know, alongside the story or something.

I'm supposed to believe that the reason the name Hussein is repeated and pictures of Obama in a turban are being placed is to silence any criticism of Obama somehow?

The way to advance Obama's popularity is to give national prime teevee time to a person who repeats all of the lies that wingnuts already believe?

Wow.

And you call me wacky for saying the TIMING of the Times piece on McCain was to rally the extreme right for McCain….something that actually, like, happened, by the way.

In addition, the Times piece was not about Iseman. Not at all. The piece was about a straight talking candidate who thinks lobbyists are perfectly fine for America. The piece was on the arrogance, or blindness, McCain exhibits about the appearance of influence peddling. He's simply above it all.

The debate questions and the recent photo are good examples. Bringing up these ludicrous rumors makes by extension any questioning of Obama appear ridiculous and/or racist.

Those manchurians are very clever.

Besides, The pinhead Cunningham and the Obama turban picture were both used to PROMOTE Obama, in case you haven't figured that out yet. They only way the MSM could be any more pro-Obama is if all the newscasters were wearing 'Vote For Obama' t-shirts.